Ý kiến khách hàng
All of our data centers on the relationship anywhere between a couple of main predictor variables-real family relations for the Facebook and involvement in Twitter Dating Fix Behavior – and you can each other general and you may Myspace-certain connecting societal capital. To check the relationship between these different bridging personal financial support, manage parameters, plus the predictors we explain more than, we ran a few nested OLS regressions.
In the regression predicting Facebook-specific bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 5.4% of the variance, with gender (?=.207, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.098, p<.05) emerging as significant, such that women and those with higher self-esteem reported higher perceived Facebook bridging social capital. The addition of the Facebook usage variables-minutes on Facebook, total Facebook Friends, and actual friends-increased the R 2 to .131, with minutes (?=.144, p<.01) and actual friends (?=.218, p<.001) positively predicting Facebook bridging social capital, supporting H1a. 569, p<.001) increased the model's R 2 to .394 and provided support for H2a. Full results are presented in Table 2.
In the regression predicting general bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 9.3% of the variance; as with Facebook-specific bridging social capital, gender (?=.182, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.255, p<.001) were significant predictors. The addition of the time and Friends variables increased the R 2 to .168. Total Facebook Friends (?=.118, p<.05) emerged as a significant predictor in this model; however, the impact of actual friends (?=.190, p<.001) on general bridging social capital was stronger, supporting H1b. Adding Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors to the model increased the R 2 to .229, and the significant positive relationship between FRMB and bridging social capital (?=.278, p<.001) provided support for H2b. See Table 3 for the full regression model.
Our research question probed the relationship between the number of “actual” friends and users’ engagement in relationship maintenance activities (FRMB), as they relate to bridging social capital. First, we conducted an OLS regression (see Model 4 in Tables 2 and 3) using the same variables as used in previous analyses as well as an interaction term (actual friends by FRMB). The interaction term was significant in both the general (?=?.571, p<.05) and Facebook-specific (?=?.857, p<.001) bridging models, suggesting that the impact of FRMB on bridging social capital may be moderated by users' reported number of actual friends in their Facebook network. The significant negative term indicates that for Facebook users who report fewer actual friends on Facebook, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with a larger increase in bridging social capital than for users who reported more actual friends on the site.
To further examine this finding, we conducted a simple slopes analysis ( Aiken West, 1991). We observed effects of FRMB on bridging social capital at three levels of actual friends: (1) reported value, (2) reported value minus one standard deviation, and (3) reported value plus one standard deviation. Results indicated that FRMB’s influence on both Facebook-specific and general bridging social capital significantly differed across the three measurement points for actual friends. For all three levels, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with higher perceived bridging social capital (see Figure 1). However, those with the fewest actual friends saw the greatest gains in bridging social capital as their engagement in FRMB increased. An analysis of variance shows this difference across the three levels of actual friends is significant for Facebook-specific bridging social capital, F(82)= p<.001, and trends towards significance with general bridging social capital, F(86)=3.204 p=.077.
Within this research, we talk about the relationship anywhere between connecting societal resource and two components off Twitter explore courtesy questionnaire data amassed regarding an example away from You.S. adults. We employed two separate measures regarding connecting social resource-you to evaluating the benefits associated with interactions with one’s circle out-of Twitter Loved ones while the most other focusing on an individual’s relations with his or the woman whole social network. Guaranteeing and you will growing on earlier knowledge regarding Facebook explore ( elizabeth.g., Burke ainsi que al., 2011; Ellison ainsi que al., 2011), we discover significant self-confident relationship anywhere between these strategies regarding connecting public financing and you may the number of “actual” Myspace family unit members members declare that he has as well as their engagement for the Facebook Relationship Restoration Routines. This study causes our very own understanding of the newest interpersonal figure from SNS fool around with from the (1) determining exactly how users’ involvement on the public brushing behaviors understood a lot more than connect to attitudes regarding bridging societal financial support-each other within Twitter Pal https://datingranking.net/it/siti-di-incontri-con-milf/ network and their social networking alot more broadly-and you may explicating the fresh interpersonal, architectural, and you may attention-selection dynamics and this subscribe which dating; (2) examining the differences when considering perceived overall and you can “actual” Family members on the website in relation to bridging social investment outcomes; and you may (3) investigating differences in attitudes regarding general bridging societal financing anywhere between pages and nonusers of one’s site.
Ý kiến khách hàng
Tin nổi bật
Tin đặc biệt